Ethical Issues in HIV Vaccine Trials

Thomas Kerns

Chapter 19

Proxy consent?

 

Sponsors of phase III HIV vaccine trials in developing nations may ask to be excused from the requirement to fully inform each individual prospective subject and to obtain each individual prospective subject's free and uncoerced consent. They could base their request on the difficulty (or impossibility) of explaining such complex material to persons in communities with less than optimum literacy, and/or on the length of time it would take to so educate each individual subject. They might also base their request on the perceived difficulty of finding large numbers of persons who are "so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice," that is, who are completely free of any possibility of coercion, constraint, duress, or intimidation. That is, they could ask instead to invoke the principle of proxy consent.
If research sponsors do ask to resort to proxies for consent, using perhaps tribal chiefs, military officers, or local health officials, as they have often done in the past, then those proxies will have to possess certain qualifications. The ERC will doubtless require that those who would be proxies 1) be competent to make reasoned judgments, 2) have adequate knowledge and information on which to base their judgments, 3) have emotional stability, and 4) have a commitment to the "incompetent" subjects' interests, which is "free of conflicts of interest and free of controlling influence by others who may not seek the [subject's] best interests".
It would probably not be difficult to find proxies who would meet qualification #1 and #3, that is, who are legally competent and emotionally stable. It may be more difficult, however, to find proxies who will have adequate knowledge and information about all the various aspects of HIV vaccine trials. And it might be even more difficult to find proxies who would satisfy condition #4, that is, who are completely free of conflicts of interest, particularly if they are in positions of influence and power. In the case of army recruits, for example, finding a proxy who has a commitment to the subjects' best interests and well being may take some doing. Even if such proxies could be found, and even if such proxies could be adequately informed and educated about the risks (and benefits?) to volunteers who participate in this research, there is still the task of insuring that these proxies are not subject to coercion, to undue influence, or to undue inducement.

(For citations and references, please see the printed version of this book)


email Dr Kerns

Curriculum Vita | TK homepage | Public lectures | Jenner homepage
EVT Table of contents
EVT Introduction | EVT chapter 1 | EVT chapter 2 | EVT chapter 3
EVT chapter 4 | EVT chapter 5 | EVT chapter 6 | EVT chapter 7 | EVT chapter 8
EVT chapter 9 | EVT chapter 10 | EVT chapter 11 | EVT chapter 12 | EVT chapter 13
EVT chapter 14 | EVT chapter 15 | EVT chapter 16 | EVT chapter 17 | EVT chapter 18
EVT chapter 19 | EVT chapter 20 | EVT chapter 21 | EVT chapter 22 | EVT chapter 23
EVT chapter 24 | EVT chapter 25 | EVT chapter 26 | EVT chapter 27
EVT Appendices | EVT Bibliography | Lancet Review of EVT

© copyright Dr Tom Kerns